Showing posts with label sports clothes for women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sports clothes for women. Show all posts
Thursday, December 4, 2014
Nathan Hydration 2012 Reflective Running Sleeves w/Mittens Review
These sleeves are perfect for autumn morning runs they stay up well and the fluro mits are a great idea. My only problem with them is that the mits don't really stay around my fingers that well, I have to kind of hold them on. But aside from that a great buy and a good price.
Monday, November 17, 2014
Discount 5.11 Rush 72 Back Pack
Customer Ratings: 
List Price: $201.41
Sale Price: $147.27
Today's Bonus: 27% Off

I'm an Army officer and this is one of the best packs on the market. It works as an all-purpose, large capacity travel bag and a rough tactical 3-day pack. The build quality is the best out there (1050 denier, stronger than 1650) with sturdy zippers. The multitude of zippered, mesh storage on the inside is GREAT. The cherry on top is its low profile when it's not filled. If you are only carrying a few things the bag stays thin and doesn't look like you are going camping at Starbucks.
Now to the review. I have a CamelBak BFM 100oz Black that I have used for camping, a Bug Out Bag, traveling, and for military use. It's comfortable to wear, even with a heavy load of about 35 lbs, assembled in the USA, and made of Cordura, so why buy the RUSH 72? I was curious about it and I wanted to return the BFM to it's original role as a BOB.
So for this review I want to compare the two, so shoppers can understand the similarities and differences between them. So first they both are about the same size about 48L to 51L depending on what advertisement you use, but the RUSH 72 is a little taller. They both are well organized, and both have water repellant capabilities. Now let's look at the differences.
Pleae note, these are tactical backpacks so they are not good at holding books, folders, or computers, though they can do it of course.
The BFM 500:
It's assembled in USA, where as the RUSH is made in Vietnam. Camelbak uses Corudra, and 5.11 Tactical uses standard nylon. They both have outer pockets to hold MREs, Water bottles etc. but the BFM's stick out to the side, while the RUSH 72 are sleeker, going into the pack itself. I personally like the Camelbak's version better. It's easier to insert something in them, and they don't take up pack space. On the other hand the RUSH 72 it's difficult to insert something like an MRE, only cylinder shaped things like bottles fit well. Also, the BFM comes with a water bladder.
The RUSH 72:
It's function and capabilities are similar to the BFM. The BFM has better material, and a lot better craftsmanship (The RUSH 72 has some loose thread, and after seven weeks of use, shows signs of loosening. The Camelbak's threading holds much better in place.) Now, the RUSH 72 has a yoke for the shoulder straps which takes getting use too. In fact the RUSH 72 has a learning curve. You have to get comfortable with the feel of the yoke, and depending on your frame you may have to get used to the feel of the tucked away waist belt poking into your sides. After a while you don't notice them anymore. One thing I like though in the main compartment is that the RUSH 72 has a pocket for holding a laptop computer, or radio. The BFM uses straps instead. One thing I don't really like is the RUSH's spill over compartment. If you have a helmet or something it's good to have, but in daily use it just gets in the way. You have to use all the buckles to hold it down, or it will flop open. This also means it's slower to open, close, and keep stable. It's hard to describe but look at a picture of the RUSH and you'll understand. My solution was to have some Velcro attached to hold it tighter in place.
What's the same?
The water repellant material on both packs works well, but I might have to give the nod to the RUSH. Both packs have been in rain storms, but I would say, using anecdotal evidence the RUSH 72 kept my belongings more dry. Both packs have a rear top pocket. On the BFM it's big enough for gloves, night vision equipment, etc. but it has no mesh compartments for small items. On the other hand the RUSH's top compartment is so small it's useless for gloves, and such items. However it has mesh pockets for holding small items. If only the best of both packs were used to make a big rear top pocket with a nice mesh pocket.
The Verdict
It depends on what you want. For quality it's Camlebak. For military application I like the BFM better actually. The outside pockets hold bulky items better, and the rear top compartment is big and useful. For my civilian travels I like the RUSH 72 better. The inside radio/laptop pocket holds my computer well, and keep it dry, and the rear top pocket with mesh is good for holding my iPod, and other miscellaneous items. The fleece lined eye glass holder is okay, but becomes near useless if the main compartment is full.
Update
Well it's been about a year since I got the RUSH. I've recently replaced it with a RAPDOM Rapid 96 Hour backpack.
The RUSH has held up well even with the loose threading. After about seven months I could stop burning off unraveling thread. Having said that it doesn't look new. The right side pocket zipper pull came off, but that's no big deal. The nylon has held up well, but you see the dirt marks that are left over even after cleaning, and the uneven tone of the bag from being exposed to lots of rain, snow, mud, and sunshine. I used it a lot. So why did I replace it? One It's not comfortable to don/doff. The straps easily get twisted up when putting it on, and they snag on something coming off.One of my coats lost a button because of this. Also, the spill over pouch and the admin section only work well when the bag is loaded down. Otherwise the weight in the admin pouch will pull the back section of the bag down, making it sag. However I'm using it as a bug out bag now, and it works fine in that regard. There's enough bulk in the main cargo area to make the admin pouch and spillover pouch stay in place, and the extra pockets come in handy. Really the RUSH 72 unlike the RAPDOM and Camelbak BFM can't be comfortably worn unless it is loaded down to keep the rear section from sagging.
PROS:
qualtity is superb very rugged built to withstand abuse
pockets lots of 'em and very usable; easy to organize
expandable webbing allows numerous MOLLE attachment points
built in Camelbak compatability
Right size to accomodate a 3-4 day patrol in cold weather
CONS: NONE (it's not cheap, but you get what you pay for!)
List Price: $201.41
Sale Price: $147.27
Today's Bonus: 27% Off
I'm an Army officer and this is one of the best packs on the market. It works as an all-purpose, large capacity travel bag and a rough tactical 3-day pack. The build quality is the best out there (1050 denier, stronger than 1650) with sturdy zippers. The multitude of zippered, mesh storage on the inside is GREAT. The cherry on top is its low profile when it's not filled. If you are only carrying a few things the bag stays thin and doesn't look like you are going camping at Starbucks.
Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>
First, I want to say I bought the updated Rush 72, from Amazon Warehouse deals as "Like New" When I got it, it had the tags, and it was clean but it contained some candles and a love letter. Apparently it was a Christmas gift turned back into Amazon with the gifts and notes inside. So, take note, buying used can produce some interesting results.Now to the review. I have a CamelBak BFM 100oz Black that I have used for camping, a Bug Out Bag, traveling, and for military use. It's comfortable to wear, even with a heavy load of about 35 lbs, assembled in the USA, and made of Cordura, so why buy the RUSH 72? I was curious about it and I wanted to return the BFM to it's original role as a BOB.
So for this review I want to compare the two, so shoppers can understand the similarities and differences between them. So first they both are about the same size about 48L to 51L depending on what advertisement you use, but the RUSH 72 is a little taller. They both are well organized, and both have water repellant capabilities. Now let's look at the differences.
Pleae note, these are tactical backpacks so they are not good at holding books, folders, or computers, though they can do it of course.
The BFM 500:
It's assembled in USA, where as the RUSH is made in Vietnam. Camelbak uses Corudra, and 5.11 Tactical uses standard nylon. They both have outer pockets to hold MREs, Water bottles etc. but the BFM's stick out to the side, while the RUSH 72 are sleeker, going into the pack itself. I personally like the Camelbak's version better. It's easier to insert something in them, and they don't take up pack space. On the other hand the RUSH 72 it's difficult to insert something like an MRE, only cylinder shaped things like bottles fit well. Also, the BFM comes with a water bladder.
The RUSH 72:
It's function and capabilities are similar to the BFM. The BFM has better material, and a lot better craftsmanship (The RUSH 72 has some loose thread, and after seven weeks of use, shows signs of loosening. The Camelbak's threading holds much better in place.) Now, the RUSH 72 has a yoke for the shoulder straps which takes getting use too. In fact the RUSH 72 has a learning curve. You have to get comfortable with the feel of the yoke, and depending on your frame you may have to get used to the feel of the tucked away waist belt poking into your sides. After a while you don't notice them anymore. One thing I like though in the main compartment is that the RUSH 72 has a pocket for holding a laptop computer, or radio. The BFM uses straps instead. One thing I don't really like is the RUSH's spill over compartment. If you have a helmet or something it's good to have, but in daily use it just gets in the way. You have to use all the buckles to hold it down, or it will flop open. This also means it's slower to open, close, and keep stable. It's hard to describe but look at a picture of the RUSH and you'll understand. My solution was to have some Velcro attached to hold it tighter in place.
What's the same?
The water repellant material on both packs works well, but I might have to give the nod to the RUSH. Both packs have been in rain storms, but I would say, using anecdotal evidence the RUSH 72 kept my belongings more dry. Both packs have a rear top pocket. On the BFM it's big enough for gloves, night vision equipment, etc. but it has no mesh compartments for small items. On the other hand the RUSH's top compartment is so small it's useless for gloves, and such items. However it has mesh pockets for holding small items. If only the best of both packs were used to make a big rear top pocket with a nice mesh pocket.
The Verdict
It depends on what you want. For quality it's Camlebak. For military application I like the BFM better actually. The outside pockets hold bulky items better, and the rear top compartment is big and useful. For my civilian travels I like the RUSH 72 better. The inside radio/laptop pocket holds my computer well, and keep it dry, and the rear top pocket with mesh is good for holding my iPod, and other miscellaneous items. The fleece lined eye glass holder is okay, but becomes near useless if the main compartment is full.
Update
Well it's been about a year since I got the RUSH. I've recently replaced it with a RAPDOM Rapid 96 Hour backpack.
The RUSH has held up well even with the loose threading. After about seven months I could stop burning off unraveling thread. Having said that it doesn't look new. The right side pocket zipper pull came off, but that's no big deal. The nylon has held up well, but you see the dirt marks that are left over even after cleaning, and the uneven tone of the bag from being exposed to lots of rain, snow, mud, and sunshine. I used it a lot. So why did I replace it? One It's not comfortable to don/doff. The straps easily get twisted up when putting it on, and they snag on something coming off.One of my coats lost a button because of this. Also, the spill over pouch and the admin section only work well when the bag is loaded down. Otherwise the weight in the admin pouch will pull the back section of the bag down, making it sag. However I'm using it as a bug out bag now, and it works fine in that regard. There's enough bulk in the main cargo area to make the admin pouch and spillover pouch stay in place, and the extra pockets come in handy. Really the RUSH 72 unlike the RAPDOM and Camelbak BFM can't be comfortably worn unless it is loaded down to keep the rear section from sagging.
Best Deals for 5.11 Rush 72 Back Pack
Purchased this for an upcoming deployment (fourth OIF/OEF tour), so I knew what I was looking for, and this pack is it. Picking out the right ruck and getting it "right-sized" is difficult; too large and you're dragging around a piece of luggage; too small and you're tying gear to the outside, snagging it on everything. Quality was important to me as well & 5.11 has a very good reputation.PROS:
qualtity is superb very rugged built to withstand abuse
pockets lots of 'em and very usable; easy to organize
expandable webbing allows numerous MOLLE attachment points
built in Camelbak compatability
Right size to accomodate a 3-4 day patrol in cold weather
CONS: NONE (it's not cheap, but you get what you pay for!)
Honest reviews on 5.11 Rush 72 Back Pack
I've carried a lot of civilian backpacks and military rucksacks in my day and this bag is great for its size. It's the perfect size to make a 72-hour bug out bag with endless options for pockets and the MOLLE webbing throughout the pack. I also bought the 5.11 Tactical MOAB 10 to use as a quick go-bag with the bare essentials and use the Rush 72 as a larger bag to carry food, clothing, and shelter. Using the Rush-tier strap system, you can dock your MOAB bag to any of the Rush series bags. This is a quality bag that will stand up to many years of abuse.Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for 5.11 Rush 72 Back Pack
This bag was worth every penny. I'm USAF Security Forces, and after my last bag (MOLLE 3 Day Military Assault Pack Backpack OD Green) fell apart during my deployment, I decided it was time to look into the names of companies I knew about. That brought me to 5.11, and eventually the 72 pack. I take between 40 and 70 pounds of gear to work everyday, so I need a bag that can withstand punishment, and give me peace of mind knowing that it's not gonna break and send my gear everywhere. After I received the bag, I filled it up, and I still have room for more gear. The nylon feels tough as nails, the handle on the top of the bag feels as strong as they 5.11 claims (2,000 pound breaking point), and it is THE most comfortable bag I have ever carried. Even with my flak vest and LBE on, this bag is still comfortable enough to make me feel like I could ruck for days. The only downside I've come to notice is the tendency for the bag to want to tip forward when I put it on the ground. So, I just attached my IFAK to the lower MOLLE on the front, and fixed the issue. 5.11 came through once again, and this bag has brought me to the conclusion that I will be purchasing anything else I need like this in the future.Friday, November 14, 2014
Reviews of New Balance Women's Impact Capri
Customer Ratings: 
List Price: $55.00
Sale Price: $36.95
Today's Bonus: 33% Off

They Fit perfectly! Enough room for flexibility, Nice length. I wish they had more colors to choose from. I would recommend these to anyone wanting a comfortable workout capri
so comfortable! looks just like in the photo.
The size was good as I expected.
very recommended.
List Price: $55.00
Sale Price: $36.95
Today's Bonus: 33% Off
They Fit perfectly! Enough room for flexibility, Nice length. I wish they had more colors to choose from. I would recommend these to anyone wanting a comfortable workout capri
Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>
Love the pocket in the back and the look and feel. Very comfortable and fits as expected. I am a small and ordered the same.Best Deals for New Balance Women's Impact Capri
i love these capris. I've been looking for a good deal on running capri's that had a back zipper pocket and finally came across these. they fit true to size (5'4", 125lbs got a size small). Will definitely be getting another pair.Honest reviews on New Balance Women's Impact Capri
I just love them!so comfortable! looks just like in the photo.
The size was good as I expected.
very recommended.
Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for New Balance Women's Impact Capri
I am already ordering my second it fit ok only thing I wish for the really nice product is I wish it was a little thicker I am a runner,other than I am please I have thick thighs and it really give than a slim look I am ok wit like I said I am getting moreTuesday, October 28, 2014
Best Minus33 Merino Wool Women's Liberty Lightweight 1/4 Zip Deals
I love merino wool. What can I say.. I have an addiction of sorts. I like my clothing a bit loose, so I ordered the large. It is shorter in length than other minus 33 wool items I have... but it hasn't been a problem.
Very light but not see through and it definitely keeps me warm.
Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>
the fit, feel, comfort of this T is excellent. I have worn and washed it several times and the sweater washes and dries very nicely. I wear it all year round -in winter it gives the base layer warmth I want and the zipper allows me to unzip it if I am too warm. The high neckline is perfect for keeping warmth in if it is chilly. In spring and summer, I sometimes want to walk with my arms covered as sun protection and again the zipper allows me to vent excess body warmth.Best Deals for Minus33 Merino Wool Women's Liberty Lightweight 1/4 Zip
I really like this top. The first time I open the package, I was a little disappointed because it is thin and not as fitted as I expected it to be, but when I started using it I realized that it doesn't matter how thin it is because it is really warm. The fitting is also perfect because I can use it as a base layer or on top of another clothing. The zipper front is perfect on my V neck tops. In total I am very happy with this thermal.Honest reviews on Minus33 Merino Wool Women's Liberty Lightweight 1/4 Zip
I like it very much. I am 5'7" and 140 pounds. I got medium and it fits perfectly. I wish it was longer so I could have wore t with legging. I would not recommend it if you are going to wear it with low rise pants. I wore it with black snow pants and it worked fine.Very light but not see through and it definitely keeps me warm.
Saturday, October 25, 2014
Reviews of Devon & Jones Women's Pima Pique Short-Sleeve Polo
I bought two of these shirts in different colors (green and raspberry) for my wife's birthday. The shirts are nicely made. Since they are all cotton, they look nice and are comfortable for her to wear in warm, muggy weather. However, we noticed something odd about the two shirts. Although they are the same size, the dimensions of one are noticeably bigger than the other. If you lay one atop the other, there is at least an inch difference in the width going from one side seam to the other. They both seem to fit her well enough, but the difference in the dimensions of the shirts seems a bit odd.
I would highly recommend this product to others. I will
be purchasing more in the future. I have also recomended this
to my employer.
I wear my name on my sleeve." Can't understand why the purple was discontinued. I need this color. Would like to order again. Oh, it wash/ wears very well. Retains color too.
Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>
This product is made of great quality and is a great price.I would highly recommend this product to others. I will
be purchasing more in the future. I have also recomended this
to my employer.
Best Deals for Devon & Jones Women's Pima Pique Short-Sleeve Polo
quality of shirt is very good. i would introduce this product to someone else. for a long time i have been looking for good quality working shirts, now i found itHonest reviews on Devon & Jones Women's Pima Pique Short-Sleeve Polo
This Pima cotton shirt is wonderful the feel is so soft and comfortable to wear I bought these for work and had them monogrammed with the v front makes the very lady like not not your guy shirt lookFind helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Devon & Jones Women's Pima Pique Short-Sleeve Polo
I love this shirt. I had my company logo stitched on and put my name on one of the sleeves. I tell my clients,I wear my name on my sleeve." Can't understand why the purple was discontinued. I need this color. Would like to order again. Oh, it wash/ wears very well. Retains color too.
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Reviews of DC Women's Fuse Snowboard Jacket
Customer Ratings: 
List Price: $150.00
Sale Price: $74.41
Today's Bonus: 50% Off

I purchased this to replace my Columbia jacket that fell apart after 13 years. I was afraid it was not going to be warm enough for North Dakota winters when I first received this but am very surprised with how warm it really is!
Fits large but warm enough for even the coldest days.
List Price: $150.00
Sale Price: $74.41
Today's Bonus: 50% Off
I purchased this to replace my Columbia jacket that fell apart after 13 years. I was afraid it was not going to be warm enough for North Dakota winters when I first received this but am very surprised with how warm it really is!
Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>
My daughter loves it, She has gotten so many compliments. Just keep in mind that DC sizes run small, My daughter is a medium but had to go up one size.Best Deals for DC Women's Fuse Snowboard Jacket
trendy jacket i bought for my mom, she doesn't have the slim fit body like the girl in the picHonest reviews on DC Women's Fuse Snowboard Jacket
if you are size 10 i recomend to get the x large, because with all of the things you have to use in winther, size L is too smallFind helpful customer reviews and review ratings for DC Women's Fuse Snowboard Jacket
A very nice jacket with performance goodies including a powder skirt on the inside.Fits large but warm enough for even the coldest days.
Thursday, September 25, 2014
Discount MLB Carlos Zambrano Chicago Cubs Youth Replica Home Jersey, White
Thursday, September 4, 2014
Puma Otf Zip-Up Hoodie Reviews
Customer Ratings: 
List Price: $55.00
Sale Price: $54.99
Today's Bonus: $0.01 Off

It is a nice jacket, it is very pretty. I enjoy it. it is a little bit bigger then what I thought , but I prefer it that way. not to tight and not to big it is comfortable.
List Price: $55.00
Sale Price: $54.99
Today's Bonus: $0.01 Off
It is a nice jacket, it is very pretty. I enjoy it. it is a little bit bigger then what I thought , but I prefer it that way. not to tight and not to big it is comfortable.
Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>
I love this hoodie. I run a couple times a week and in the so-so weather it's awesome. I agree with previous poster the sleeves are a tad too short. I'm 5'8" and 130 lbs, the medium fits me perfectly except for the thumb hole. I cannot put my thumbs in those, the sleeves are too short for that. But if you don't want to use the holes, the sleeves are just the right size. I'd love if the pockets had zippers, and if the strings in the hood were navy and not white. ( with white it looks like you're wearing shoelaces around your neck )Best Deals for Puma Otf Zip-Up Hoodie
I honestly have been in search for a decent, lightweight, water resistant comfy jacket for ages. Ever since I lost my heavier one I wanted to try online for some better deals. This is a fantastic jacket, it is very light, warm, but not dead of winter warm. Good for brisk evenings, jogs, and something really flashy and cute. I got the red, and it is gorgeous in person. My only small complaint is that the arms are a little short for the thumb pocket things. I am 5'7" 120lbs, with average arms and the sleeves are not too tight at all. If I went a size up from medium, I know it would be much too large around my middle. True to its size, great athletic feel, overall very happy. I will go jogging in some light rain and see how it holds up to a *little* abuse, haha!Wednesday, September 3, 2014
New Orleans Saints Touchback V Full Zip Hoodie Sweatshirt Review
Sweat Shirt is very thick and warm top quality. I have no regrets buying this sweat shirt as a birthday gift.great fitting hoody, logo looks great, sized correctly not like an asian import, great for all saints fans. A +
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
Discount Nixon Wit Watch - Women's
Customer Ratings: 
List Price: $149.95
Sale Price: Price Unavailable
Today's Bonus: 20% Off

I love this brand, I have five watches from them and have never been disappointed with the brand, this watch feels good on my wrist and is not very big, plus all the people have told me that this watch its very nice and looks like a very expensive watch.
I used it with some bracelets and looks so good.
List Price: $149.95
Sale Price: Price Unavailable
Today's Bonus: 20% Off
I love this brand, I have five watches from them and have never been disappointed with the brand, this watch feels good on my wrist and is not very big, plus all the people have told me that this watch its very nice and looks like a very expensive watch.
I used it with some bracelets and looks so good.
Sunday, August 17, 2014
Cheap NBA Chicago Bulls Derrick Rose Replica Home Jersey - R28E5Bb5 Youth
I purchased this jersey for my son. It fits true to size, it is a good replica of the original, the fabric is good quality. Overall a great pick for kids 10-13.
Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>
My son is a big D Rose fan and loves this jersey. We've washed it numerous times over the past couple of months (in the dryer too) and it still looks brand new very nice quality.Best Deals for NBA Chicago Bulls Derrick Rose Replica Home Jersey - R28E5Bb5 Youth
When i recieved my jersey , It had a big red staind that wouldnt come off. Im looking forward to ordering a new one , but if its stained i'll get ordering stuff.Honest reviews on NBA Chicago Bulls Derrick Rose Replica Home Jersey - R28E5Bb5 Youth
my son loves this one and wears it almost every time the Bulls play. Easy to wash and fits perfectly.Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for NBA Chicago Bulls Derrick Rose Replica Home Jersey - R28E5Bb5 Youth
My son had been wanting a Rose jersey for quite a long time and when we found this one I knew I wouldn't find another for the price. It is well-made and we are very pleased with it.NFL Carolina Panthers Critical Victory VI T-Shirt - Black Review
Bought this for my husband as one of his Christmas presents. He absolutely loves it. Perfect fit and colors are nice and bold. Overall a great shirt plus received in a good time frame with the free standard shipping!
Sunday, August 10, 2014
Tuga Sportz Women's Spandex Shorts Reviews
The material is sooo thin and cheap, too small and just horrible. A total waste of money...don't bother buything them.
It does emphasize belly fat and love handles, but as the shorts aren't a body shaper, that is to be expected. The fabric does pucker a bit at the top of the leg since it isn't stretched taut. The 3" inseam feels like shorts rather than underwear. The white is transparent.
I would recommend them for under clothing unless you have a trim body and buy a darker color.
Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>
I bought these to go under short skirts. I didn't want to have a too stretch appearance and bought a large (42" hips, 36" waist). These were looser than I expected and fit just right for shorts.It does emphasize belly fat and love handles, but as the shorts aren't a body shaper, that is to be expected. The fabric does pucker a bit at the top of the leg since it isn't stretched taut. The 3" inseam feels like shorts rather than underwear. The white is transparent.
I would recommend them for under clothing unless you have a trim body and buy a darker color.
Best Deals for Tuga Sportz Women's Spandex Shorts
They are a little pricey but they are exactly what I wanted and great for under boardshorts will order moreHonest reviews on Tuga Sportz Women's Spandex Shorts
just what we were looking for in a volleyball athletic short. The color is not quite navy, but dark enoughFind helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Tuga Sportz Women's Spandex Shorts
I ordered the wrong size in this. I requested a return, and immediately re-ordered in the right size. I had notice of my refund within a couple of days. Great customer service on this deal that was "my fault". Thank you!Friday, August 8, 2014
Reviews of Sport Tek V-Neck Raglan Wind Shirt
I was really looking everywhere for these wind shirts. Everywhere I went it was the wrong type or the right type for the wrong price. I was so glad I found these shirts. One of my best purchases from Amazon. Thanks.
Click Here For Most Helpful Customer Reviews >>
I HAVE PURCHED MANY DIFFERENT BRANDS OF WINDSHIRTS FOR MY EMPLOYEES AND PAID ALMOST DOUBLE THE PRICE. THIS IS BY FAR A GOOD QUALITY WINDSHIRT AND I PLAN ON BUYING 25 MORE TODAY!!!!!Best Deals for Sport Tek V-Neck Raglan Wind Shirt
I got this for my husband for Christmas. He loved everything about it. Especially the zipper on the side at the bottem. The only thing is, we have to get it a size bigger. Luckily he had a friend who loved it just as much as he did, so he happily bought it off of us. I will definitely be ordering the size bigger for him since he loved it so much.Honest reviews on Sport Tek V-Neck Raglan Wind Shirt
Delivery was fast, the fit was as it said, color as it showed. My husband was thrilled. The only thing is it should have stipulated it was unlined....but that is what he wanted anyway.Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Sport Tek V-Neck Raglan Wind Shirt
This materials very comfortable,and fits perfect, not cheap material, I would buy 2more just to have, not to heavy and not to light, perfect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)